Veronica Reviews ‘Finch’ Post Apocalyptic #SciFi Movie

I enjoyed “Finch,” the new dystopian offering on Apple+ TV and even though it’s long at 2 hours 34 minutes, I wasn’t bored at any point. Tom Hanks plays the title character, a survivor of the huge solar flare that wiped out Earth’s civilization, who has been living pretty successfully on his own in a deep ‘fortress of solitude’ type research facility. I really wished he could have stayed there because the place was fascinating and I enjoyed all the modifications he’d made to keep things running for himself, his dog Goodyear and a cute robot named Dewey. But alas, the weather is worsening and apparently his wind turbine power source isn’t going to survive the coming mega hurricane. Without power, his perfect shelter will become unlivable.

Finch had pretty much scavenged everything worthwhile in his immediate vicinity as well so food was going to become an issue soon too or so I surmised.

He has to rush the final stages of creating his most complex creation – a thinking, talking robot. Not to serve as his own companion mind you, but to take care of the dog when Finch himself is gone. The movie makes clear pretty much from the start that Finch has had too much exposure to radiation and is very much on a downward health spiral. The robot, voiced by Caleb Landry Jones, has no name at first but over the course of the movie as he evolves, a name emerges. That whole process was rather amusing. There was only time to download  72% of the vast library into the robot that Finch had originally planned to provide and for the creation to learn to walk and they’re off on a road trip to find a new location.

The robot, who eventually self-selects Jeff as his name (I hope that isn’t too much of a spoiler for you) has been programmed with the famous and enduring Three Laws of Robotics created by Isaac Asimov in 1942 (!) and a fourth Law created by Finch, that any issue of the dog’s well-being overrides all the others. I suppose in the future if Jeff ever encounters a group of hostile humans he can use the Fourth Dog Law to save himself and Goodyear.

Hanks is excellent as always and his Finch is irascible, brilliant, resourceful, impatient, a wonderful dog owner and stern mentor to Jeff.  Finch declares he needs no one and really never much cared for people but there are small flashes of a warmer person underneath and he’s definitely the father figure to Jeff. Through the course of the movie we do get Finch’s backstory and some explanation for why he has his heart set on making this trek to the Golden Gate bridge. Always good to have a destination! The elements and hints and clues all hang together well and explain why he treats both Goodyear and Jeff the way he does.

If you read and/or watch much dystopian science fiction, there really wasn’t anything new here as far as world building or the nature of the adventures, other than the plot elements of the robot evolving into greater self-awareness and understanding. The story of Jeff arriving at personhood was pretty straightforward SF as well, but enjoyable to watch and had a few unique elements involving the dog. And Jeff’s fashion sense as to what a well-dressed post-apocalyptic robot should wear was new! I was surprised the film makers didn’t do much more with the vast accumulation of knowledge Jeff possessed but on balance it was probably realistic, as he had to concentrate on ‘growing up’ fast. Time to use the encyclopedia in his CPU later.

I was also bemused at how robotic and not-human Jeff’s appearance was but I guess since Finch didn’t really care about other humans, he didn’t see much point in making his dog’s robot caretaker into a pseudo-human. And of course he had to work with whatever materials he could scavenge and scrounge.

I had to question the capabilities of the RV Finch and Jeff were using for their monumental  trek just a tad.  I guess the 1984 Fleetwood Southwind RV model was one tough vehicle though! Or else Finch did a lot of enhancements. Either way, it proved to be a trusty vehicle, even when driven by a robot with no learners’ permit.

Goodyear the dog was excellent. He was played by a former rescue canine named Seamus and is believed to be a terrier mix. The relationship between dog and robot is fun to watch because at first the dog isn’t a fan, despite Jeff’s  efforts to “learn to speak dog”. By the end of the movie….well, I can’t spoil things. Watch it and see for yourself.

Other than a brief flashback, there really aren’t any other people in the movie, except as implied threats but at certain points there’s a lot of tension as to whether our heroes will escape a cleverly laid trap.

Usually I dislike any movie that makes me tear up but as I said above, we start the film knowing Finch is terminally ill and he gets much more debilitated as the road trip progresses. The entire story was so well done I didn’t even mind my own emotion so that says a lot.

And the film makers do add in some totally unexpected grace notes and signs of hope for the future of the planet, which were lovely and lifted the gloomy atmosphere nicely.

I am worried about Jeff the robot and his first encounter in the future face to face with humans who aren’t Finch, which I guess tells you how much I bought into the whole thing, if I’m still actively concerned the next morning. And dogs don’t live forever either so what will Jeff do when his canine companion crosses the rainbow bridge eventually? Will he find another dog somewhere? Adopt a cat? Build his own robot companion?

Questions for another day and another movie. I’d enjoy a sequel although at this point there’s no talk of one.

I give “Finch” a solid B+/A- and would probably watch it again someday.

Veronica Scott Reviews ‘VAST OF NIGHT’

This post first appeared on the AMAZING STORIES MAGAZINE blog…

vast of night posterI approached the “The Vast of Night” directed by Andrew Patterson, written by James Montague and Craig W. Sanger, as a viewer who is a longtime lover of B, C and even D science fiction movies, ready for some thrills and a little fun with my popcorn. In the rural area where I grew up, movies such as “Them”, “Attack of the Killer Shrews” and “It Came From Outer Space” were the late night and Saturday matinee fare on our local TV stations. I also loved “The Twilight Zone” and its small slice of eerie life,asking was it or wasn’t it real and never letting you know what happened next after the show ended.

(And yes, I’m a huge fan of A level science fiction movies too but “The Vast of Night” wasn’t trying to be in that category as far as I can tell.)

So I settled in to watch the movie, available now for streaming on Amazon Prime. Bottom line (and no spoilers here), I enjoyed it, recommend it if you like this genre as I do and give it a B+. Here are my detailed thoughts:

I loved the small town setting and feel, which mirrored the old movies so well. The events in the classics of the genre almost always seemed to happen in an isolated place, where the characters were on their own to cope and survive or not. When Everett (Jake Horowitz) the cocky radio DJ and Fay (Sierra McCormick) the young but plucky switchboard operator went walking or running through town as they do repeatedly, I’d cringe for them, because it was a small town and so deserted. Everyone else is at the big basketball game, you see, which is where the movie opens – brightly lit, full of people, a slice of normal life in a place about to get very weird but only for certain people.

I didn’t mind the nod to “The Twilight Zone,” with references and clips from a mythical program entitled “Paradox Theater”, but I didn’t care for the moments when Everett and Fay themselves were shown as characters in a “Paradox Theater” episode. The device pulled me out of the flow of the movie and seemed gratuitous.

The extended early scene where Everett and Fay walk endlessly through their small town of Cayuga and talk and talk and TALK ran long to me. I got that Fay was a science buff bigtime (nice switch – in the old movies it was usually the crewcut guy who read all the magazines and knew all the science in the world) while Everett was clearly more a man of the world (how old was he supposed to be?) with a nice veneer of sophistication. He had a killer radio voice too and knew all about tape recorders. But I thought the sequence went on too long and got too wink-wink cutesy with the two of them discussing far out futuristic ideas like self-driving cars and tiny phones with TV screens. Ok, yeah, so we know which ones actually happened and which ones haven’t as yet but again, did we need so many examples?

How could it take so long to walk through a tiny town?

I thought this was a problem the movie suffered from in several places and could have used tightening up. (I don’t write or make movies but I do write novels so I know a thing or two about pacing.) When the caller who knows mysterious details about a government coverup conspiracy and the “is she crazy or telling the truth?” old lady shared their stories…wayyy too long for this viewer. Yes, real people do want to share too many extraneous details in interviews and go off on tangents to the actual story but in a movie or a novel, that kind of indulgence can get deadly. In fact, I was nearly ready to bail on the movie at one point because of this overly expositive exposition but I hung in there because I liked the characters and I was intrigued overall.

I found myself most fascinated by the switchboard. I could have used even more scenes there. The idea of Fay being connected to the entire world and getting little snippets of what was happening, as well as getting cut off in the middle of scary moments really worked for me. Heightened the mood and the goose bumps factor.

I got annoyed with her for running every place. Hello, old fashioned manually driven cars do exist in town and Everett is right there with one at his disposal for much of the movie. It became a point of disbelief to me after about the third time she sprints off when he could have driven her to her destination much more quickly and safely.

I did believe the two of them became so caught up in what was happening that it never occurred to either of them to go back to the well-lit gymnasium and try to recruit help. I understood their stubborn ownership of the events, especially in light of Everett’s constant reminders it might be a news story. I could see him leveraging it in his mind as a way out of the tiny town of Cayuga.

So the movie took its time building and just at the point where I thought the plot was going to kind of peter out and never really give any answers – WHOA. Head turning, all-in EVENTS. I’m not giving spoilers but I was riveted for the last half hour or so and rewatched the ending a few times. I’m still thinking about it today. I was happy I stayed with the narrative.

There are a few unanswered questions for me inagoodway. What happened to the strange, too perfect out of town couple who keep popping up at odd moments? Were they part of the overarching events or victims? Given the radio broadcast and things the conspiracy theorist mentioned, why didn’t any government agents show up? (If they did, I missed them.)

At some points in the movie I felt as if this was a “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” adjacent story, almost as if that movie was off in the distance, happening in parallel maybe or somewhat in the same timeline but decades hence. The old lady’s long recitation of local history and her own brush with the inexplicable really gave me that feeling.

I would have loved a tiny epilogue with the townspeople but I do feel the movie ended in the right place.

Sign me up for more of these “Paradox Theater”, movie length episodes!

Veronica Scott, gal reporter, signing off. Watch the skies, folks.

**************************************************

Read Veronica’s reviews of some favorite old scifi movies:

G is For Gila Monster Movies

I Have Seen “Return of the Killer Shrews”

Interview with Director Steve Latshaw, “Return of the Killer Shrews”

Killer Shrews and Other Classics of the Late Night Movies